They control national security through FISA applications to FISC and they have the power to destroy evidence of wiretaps. Continue reading “Can This Federal Judge Be the Most Dangerous Man in America?”
From you of course- whether or not you are involved with the courts. It is easy to assume that lawyers make so much money it’s from their personal piggybanks, or that they pass the hat around at the water cooler. That’s what they expect you to think, but closer to the truth is that it comes from politically-protected case-fixing, orchestrated in plain sight for anyone that bothers to pay attention. It’s so obvious its maddening that it has been allowed to continue unmentioned for about five decades. And you- either directly or indirectly, pay for this obscene, highly visible quid pro quo.
The legal industry designed for themselves, a faux Judicial Conduct Board whose operating procedures make no mention of protecting the public from judicial criminality. It states their only responsibility to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is “preservation of the reputation of the judiciary,” and no judge has ever been removed or prosecuted for damages against an individual citizen. The “government,” which Continue reading “The Fake Judicial Conduct Board Protecting the Greatest Source of Campaign Financing”
An epidemic of government corruption in America has led to economic decline, and social unrest. Evidence increasingly points to a major source as the Judicial Branch – the most powerful part of the government, expected to have the most integrity. It is no longer just conjecture, as citizen complaints of racketeering and misconduct by members of the Judiciary, are rampant across social media. A study published by Yale University Law School supports this reality, that judicial corruption is a major U.S. problem. Continue reading “America Wakes Up To Find Its Judicial Branch Infiltrated By Organized Crime”
The former head of the Department of Justice Civil Rights division, Vanita Gupta, sent out a bold letter (below) before her resignation in 2016. What many courts consider a “routine administrative matter” of forcing defendants to pre-pay a “bond” or “bail” before they’re allowed to schedule a court date, or incarcerate a person for nonpayment of fines or fees without first conducting an indigency determination and establishing that the failure to pay was willful, is actually unconstitutional, Gupta wrote. This is especially applicable to family court and support issues. Continue reading “DOJ Cites that Jailing Debtors is Unconstitutional…It May Be Time to Jail Judges Instead…”
Updated May 31, 2017
When former Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane received a campaign contribution from billionaire, twice convicted mobster Louis DeNaples, she returned it. But that did not stop the media in Pennsylvania from heavily reporting on it. The media further made a huge deal that District Attorney Stephen Zappala also got donations from DeNaples, resulting in his withdrawing from his candidacy for Pennsylvania Attorney General last year. Continue reading “Sordid Backgrounds of Pennsylvania Judges”
The renowned journal the Legal Intelligencer recently revisited an embarrassing industry topic in an article entitled “Why Do Pennsylvania’s Courts Suffer From Chronic Scandal?” While the author included its numerous infamous scandals as evidence, they fell short in answering their own question. It is answered here. The failure to remedy the situation itself speaks volumes, with an obvious aversion to interfering with the status quo… the reason is simple and not unique to Pennsylvania. Continue reading “The Money Laundering Behind Chronic Judicial Corruption”
Last Updated May 29, 2017 : 8:10 PM EST
Even for those that have become resigned to accepting the status quo, the series of events in the following brings a whole new perspective to judicial corruption. While such abuse of power is now expected, the state of Pennsylvania has very unique influence all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. If none of the following is true, the above pictured federal judges surely would have offered proof to refute it, to “preserve confidence” in the judiciary. Thus far they have declined to do so. Continue reading “Federal Judges Caught Fixing Cases- Does the Corruption Lead to SCOTUS?”
Without the Seventh Amendment, which guarantees the right to civil jury trial, we cannot defend our rights under the First, Second, or any other Amendments of the Bill of Rights. Jury trials are the institutional check against judicial criminality. Because relatively few people become involved in litigation, the fact that civil jury trials have almost completely disappeared has gone unnoticed.The average citizen assumes that should they become entangled in a lawsuit, the problem will be resolved by a jury of their peers. They are sorely mistaken; more often than not, they will be at the mercy of one person — a judge who has very little restrictions on how they want to apply the law. Continue reading “Erosion of the Seventh Amendment”
While most mainstream media outlets are still on the judicial bandwagon, it appears that rather than get caught in the crossfire, some are starting CYA campaigns. More journalists are exposing each day, that the lives of millions of Americans over the last fifty years, have been destroyed because of abuse of power and collusion by judges and attorneys. A shadow government appears to have formed in the judicial branch via what is essentially a lawyers union, -the American Bar Association with its state and county subsidiaries- that have continually manipulated court rules to block all avenues of protection and restitution against judicial misconduct. It is estimated that 40,000 Americans are falsely imprisoned, and millions have had assets extorted by lawyers and judges through intentional complicating of cases to increase legal fees, with nowhere to turn for help except judicial conduct boards populated by these same bar members. Americans are often essentially trapped for years, once they get involved in the court system.
Continue reading “Are Judges and Lawyers Around the Country Finally Realizing Its Game Over?”
With the daily bombardment by the media of the quintessential collapse of Executive and Congressional ethics, the Judiciary seems to be getting a free pass. Yet it is the most covert, and most powerful branch of our government, with lifetime appointed, unsupervised, unelected people, controlling the law in this country. Continue reading “OVERLOOKING THE OBVIOUS: Why the Federal Judiciary is Getting a Free Pass from Investigation”
January 2, 2018
Governor Tom Wolf
Office of the Governor
508 Main Capitol Building
Harrisburg, PA 17120
Superior Court President
Judge Susan Gantman
200 Four Falls Corp Ctr
West Conshohocken 19428
Re: Dismissal of Appeal for Hard Copies?
On August 14th and October 27, 2017, I had submitted briefs via the e-file system, on the appeal of the foreclosure on my home. Even though it was still in litigation, the courts would not delay the Sheriff sale on May 31,, 2017, evidence the outcome of this case has been predetermined. On November 8, 2017, I received an order stating the Prothonotary had tried to reach me via telephone multiple times, and that I needed to submit hard copies of my “brief” within seven days.
NOT DEPENDENT UPON THE GOVERNMENT TO PRACTICE LAW?
The below excerpt is from the Preamble of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers. It was taken from the rules in Pennsylvania, however, it is derived from the American Bar Association’s national rules, that controls all of the country’s bar associations. It claims that the Judicial System is not dependent upon the government for the right to practice law. This is beyond unconstitutional, a lawless statement and it is unbelievable that it has gone unchallenged for decades.
 To the extent that lawyers meet the obligations of their professional calling, the occasion for government regulation is obviated. Self-regulation also helps maintain the legal profession’s independence from government domination. An independent legal profession is an important force in preserving government under law, for abuse of legal authority is more readily challenged by a profession whose members are not dependent on government for the right to practice. Continue reading “Bar Association Claims Members Are Above the Law”