Bar Association Claims Members Are Above the Law

NOT DEPENDENT UPON THE GOVERNMENT TO PRACTICE LAW?

The below excerpt is from the Preamble of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers.  It was taken from the rules in Pennsylvania, however, it is derived from the American Bar Association’s national rules,  that controls all of the country’s bar associations. It claims that the Judicial System is not dependent upon the government for the right to practice law.  This is beyond unconstitutional, a lawless statement and it is unbelievable that it has gone unchallenged for decades.

[11] To the extent that lawyers meet the obligations of their professional calling, the occasion for government regulation is obviated. Self-regulation also helps maintain the legal profession’s independence from government domination. An independent legal profession is an important force in preserving government under law, for abuse of legal authority is more readily challenged by a profession whose members are not dependent on government for the right to practice.

This needs to be challenged immediately by the executive branch of our federal government and stricken immediately. There is no dispute that this is non-democratic and in violation of every principle that supports equal treatment under the law, and is what is fueling the collapse the integrity of our government.

MORE FODDER FROM THEIR RULES

These rules are an abomination.  Here they declare they do not have to even follow their own rules.  This entire set of “rules” was set in place without the “consent of the governed,” without legislation – and it is the most crucial part of our government.  We are a sinking ship because of this.

[19] Violation of a Rule should not itself give rise to a cause of action against a lawyer nor should it create any presumption in such a case that a legal duty has been breached. In addition, violation of a Rule does not necessarily warrant any other nondisciplinary remedy, such as disqualification of a lawyer in pending litigation.

Because of this cult-like environment, the Innocence Project has had approximately 400 innocent people released from prison, and thousands of children were falsely imprisoned in Luzerne County, PA.  Lawyers have used this “independence” to lie, cheat and steal-they have been supported and encouraged  with the complicity of Judges who rely on them for campaign funds.  In researching campaign financing, it is found that the majority of all money comes from law firms and lawyers.

DOJ Cites that Jailing Debtors is Unconstitutional…It May Be Time to Jail Judges Instead…

The former head of the Department of Justice Civil Rights division, Vanita Gupta,  sent out a bold letter (below) before her resignation in 2016. What many courts consider a “routine administrative matter” of forcing defendants to pre-pay a “bond” or “bail” before they’re allowed to schedule a court date, or incarcerate a person for nonpayment of fines or fees without first conducting an indigency determination and establishing that the failure to pay was willful,  is actually unconstitutional, Gupta wrote. This is especially applicable to family court and support  issues. Continue reading “DOJ Cites that Jailing Debtors is Unconstitutional…It May Be Time to Jail Judges Instead…”

Sordid Backgrounds of Pennsylvania Judges

Updated May 31, 2017

When former Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane received a campaign contribution from billionaire, twice convicted mobster Louis DeNaples,  she returned it.  But that did not stop the media in Pennsylvania from heavily reporting on it.   The media further made a huge deal that District Attorney Stephen Zappala also got  donations from DeNaples, resulting in his withdrawing from his candidacy for Pennsylvania Attorney General last year.  Continue reading “Sordid Backgrounds of Pennsylvania Judges”

The Money Laundering Behind Chronic Judicial Corruption

The renowned journal the Legal Intelligencer recently revisited an embarrassing industry topic in an article entitled “Why Do Pennsylvania’s Courts Suffer From Chronic Scandal?” While the author included its numerous infamous scandals as evidence, they fell short in answering their own question.  It is answered here. The failure to remedy the situation itself speaks volumes, with an  obvious aversion to interfering with the status quo…  the reason is simple and  not unique to Pennsylvania. Continue reading “The Money Laundering Behind Chronic Judicial Corruption”

Is Pennsylvania Government Run by the Mafia…Or is this just Non-Compliance with EEOC? Judge for Yourself!

DISTURBING AND DISCRIMINATORY “LACK OF DIVERSITY” IN KEY POSITIONS OF PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNMENT

LOOK WHO HOLDS   ALL THESE KEY OFFICIAL POSITIONS NOW OR JUST PREVIOUSLY..would it be odd if all these names were all Asian, Jewish or some other ethnicity? It does not look like it is Russia that is the “deep state” …it appears it more like John Podesta and friends! There are a lot positions here that the citizens depend upon for ethics and law enforcement of public officials. Continue reading “Is Pennsylvania Government Run by the Mafia…Or is this just Non-Compliance with EEOC? Judge for Yourself!”

Federal Judges Caught Fixing Cases and a Path of Corruption to SCOTUS

Last Updated May 29, 2017 : 8:10 PM EST

Even for those that have long suspected the court system is really nothing more than a legal industry, the series of events in the following  brings a whole new perspective to judicial corruption.   While similar deception is likely happening across the country, the state of Pennsylvania has very unique influence all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.   If none of the following is true, the above pictured cabal of judges surely would have offered proof to refute it, and to “preserve confidence” in the judiciary. Continue reading “Federal Judges Caught Fixing Cases and a Path of Corruption to SCOTUS”

The Black Hole at the Bottom of the Swamp

As President Trump  struggles to “make America great again”  the “draining of the swamp” has been self-effectuating. We just saw how some of that muck surfacing from the bottom,  could possibly have put themselves in control of national security. There is a larger lesson here to be learned  from the dog and pony show that three judges put on for the country. Continue reading “The Black Hole at the Bottom of the Swamp”

Clintongate versus Porngate: A Tale of Two Email Scandals That Just Doesn’t Add Up

The saga of Democrat and first female Pennsylvania Attorney General, Kathleen Kane, is an interesting contrast to that of Presidential Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton’s quagmire regarding mishandling of official government emails.  In fact, the two women are, or were comrades and Clinton supported Kane’s run for office in 2012. The difference of course is who they were up against and how much money they had to fight allegations, making the speed and timing of today’s announcement that Clinton has been cleared a bit suspicious. Continue reading “Clintongate versus Porngate: A Tale of Two Email Scandals That Just Doesn’t Add Up”

Why Hurry When You Are Getting Paid by the Hour?

The unregulated,  unlimited ability of attorneys to charge their clients by the hour, for as many hours a week as possible,  is nothing more than an incentive to prolong cases. This is an abomination in this country.  The members of every bar association have used this to trap litigants in the court  system until they extort as much of their assets as possible.  There is no motivation for any attorney to ever expedite a case quickly, and in fact the current system has the exact opposite objective.  Judges never issue sanctions against attorneys, as these attorneys are the ones that put them in office to begin with, by funding their judicial campaigns. Continue reading “Why Hurry When You Are Getting Paid by the Hour?”

Erosion of the Seventh Amendment

Without the Seventh Amendment, which guarantees the right to civil jury trial, we cannot defend our rights under the First, Second, or any other Amendments of the Bill of Rights. Jury trials are the institutional check against judicial criminality.  Because relatively few people become involved in litigation, the fact that civil jury trials have almost completely disappeared has gone unnoticed.The average citizen assumes that should they become entangled in a lawsuit, the problem will be resolved by a jury of their peers. They are sorely mistaken; more often than not, they will be at the mercy of one person — a judge who has very little restrictions on how they want to apply the law. Continue reading “Erosion of the Seventh Amendment”