AN ABUSE OF POWER: HOW THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT USES ARTICLE V, SECTION 10(C) OF THE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTITUTION TO DOMINATE PROCEDURAL LAWMAKING, AND WHY PENNSYLVANIA SHOULD AMEND THIS CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION
Jason Bologna, Esq.
Copyright (c) 1998 Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education
Introduction
James Madison once observed that “[t]he essence of government is power; and power, lodged as … Continue Reading ››
The Legal Professions Monopoly on the Practice of Law – Fordham University Critique
Expert Opinions on Judicial Corruption
Message Sent to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rules Committee
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them.”
U.S. Supreme Court Opinion -MIRANDA V. ARIZONA 384 U.S. 436 (1966)For too long, the Pennsylvania Rules Committees have been allowed to twist and pervert the procedures to obstruct citizens access to hearings and jury trials.
The rules need to be reviewed by the legislature as to their constitutionality – greedy lawyers are concocting procedures purely to rip-off the public –especially pro se litigants. I know of no pro se litigants that have … Continue Reading ››